summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/content/posts/proprietary-software-is-anti-capitalist.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRobby Zambito <contact@robbyzambito.me>2020-12-01 08:59:23 -0500
committerRobby Zambito <contact@robbyzambito.me>2020-12-01 08:59:23 -0500
commitd5bfc8840746df1667a0d20925afced557afcf53 (patch)
tree9f7fb03c287d7ced0ecbc6acdb4bab260d8b64ac /content/posts/proprietary-software-is-anti-capitalist.md
parent25e5af0b23ce945622006d77582387a1488644e9 (diff)
Added some photos, updated theme, moved posts around, started working on new post
Diffstat (limited to 'content/posts/proprietary-software-is-anti-capitalist.md')
-rw-r--r--content/posts/proprietary-software-is-anti-capitalist.md37
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 37 deletions
diff --git a/content/posts/proprietary-software-is-anti-capitalist.md b/content/posts/proprietary-software-is-anti-capitalist.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 96cf0ef..0000000
--- a/content/posts/proprietary-software-is-anti-capitalist.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,37 +0,0 @@
----
-title: "Proprietary Software is Anti-Capitalist"
-date: 2020-11-17T07:26:15-05:00
-draft: false
-tags: [free-software, capitalism]
----
-
-A theoretically perfect market under capitalism assumes that consumers have
-access to an infinite supply of producers. This allows consumers to inspect the
-market, and select the product that best fits their needs. In the long term,
-monopolies erode capitalism, because they meaningfully constrict the market and
-decrease the options available to consumers. This means that consumers have
-limited access to a variety of products and services under a market controlled
-by a monopoly.
-
-A patent is a construct that grants a company a temporary monopoly to produce
-something. This is based on the assumption that guaranteed monopolistic power
-for a temporary period can encourage innovation. Some assume that proprietary
-software licencing can encourage innovation in a similar way. However this is
-not the case, because the proprietor of a piece of software actually has a
-permanent monopoly on the marketable actions to that software, such as
-distribution, repair, and modification.
-
-The key difference between Free Software and proprietary software for the
-average consumer is not that they have the right to view the source code and
-learn to repair or modify their own software. The difference is that the
-consumer can access an unrestricted market of software developers to make
-the modifications or repairs to the software that the consumer desires. This is
-no different than a consumer bringing their car to their mechanic of choice in
-order to repair or modify their vehicle.
-
-Should you be interested in finding support for Free Software, or if you are
-interested in providing service, the [Free Software Foundation has put together
-a list of services](https://www.fsf.org/resources/service) that could provide
-assistance. You could also reach out to freelance software developers on sites
-like Fiverr, or Upwork.
-