From d5bfc8840746df1667a0d20925afced557afcf53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robby Zambito Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 08:59:23 -0500 Subject: Added some photos, updated theme, moved posts around, started working on new post --- .../index.md | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) create mode 100644 content/posts/neuralink-is-mind-control-and-mind-reading/index.md (limited to 'content/posts/neuralink-is-mind-control-and-mind-reading') diff --git a/content/posts/neuralink-is-mind-control-and-mind-reading/index.md b/content/posts/neuralink-is-mind-control-and-mind-reading/index.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2d9be8e --- /dev/null +++ b/content/posts/neuralink-is-mind-control-and-mind-reading/index.md @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +--- +title: "Neuralink Is Mind Control and Mind Reading" +date: 2020-11-20T06:27:50-05:00 +description: "Description for post" +type: "post" +draft: true +tags: [free-software, neuralink, freedom] +--- + +The Neuralink team has done an incredible job at avoiding the terms "mind +control" and "mind reading", when that is exactly the product they are +developing. Every single talk from Elon Musk about Neuralink, and everything on +the Neuralink website describes the benefits on mind control. They mention +things like how their "brain-computer interface" can be used to "help people +with severe spinal cord injury", and how human-computer interactions could be +made more effecient. + +They do a good job at failing to properly mention the potential negatives of +commercial mind control. Who's computer will my brain be connected to? -- cgit