summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/content/posts/neuralink-is-mind-control-and-mind-reading
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'content/posts/neuralink-is-mind-control-and-mind-reading')
-rw-r--r--content/posts/neuralink-is-mind-control-and-mind-reading/index.md19
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/content/posts/neuralink-is-mind-control-and-mind-reading/index.md b/content/posts/neuralink-is-mind-control-and-mind-reading/index.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2d9be8e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/posts/neuralink-is-mind-control-and-mind-reading/index.md
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+---
+title: "Neuralink Is Mind Control and Mind Reading"
+date: 2020-11-20T06:27:50-05:00
+description: "Description for post"
+type: "post"
+draft: true
+tags: [free-software, neuralink, freedom]
+---
+
+The Neuralink team has done an incredible job at avoiding the terms "mind
+control" and "mind reading", when that is exactly the product they are
+developing. Every single talk from Elon Musk about Neuralink, and everything on
+the Neuralink website describes the benefits on mind control. They mention
+things like how their "brain-computer interface" can be used to "help people
+with severe spinal cord injury", and how human-computer interactions could be
+made more effecient.
+
+They do a good job at failing to properly mention the potential negatives of
+commercial mind control. Who's computer will my brain be connected to?