summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/data/transactions/logic/resources_test.go
blob: 6458e081a1fa2c447537e6e25e47321cb6aa3d83 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
// Copyright (C) 2019-2024 Algorand, Inc.
// This file is part of go-algorand
//
// go-algorand is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
// it under the terms of the GNU Affero General Public License as
// published by the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the
// License, or (at your option) any later version.
//
// go-algorand is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
// but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
// MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
// GNU Affero General Public License for more details.
//
// You should have received a copy of the GNU Affero General Public License
// along with go-algorand.  If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.

package logic_test

import (
	"encoding/binary"
	"fmt"
	"strings"
	"testing"

	"github.com/algorand/go-algorand/data/basics"
	"github.com/algorand/go-algorand/data/transactions"
	. "github.com/algorand/go-algorand/data/transactions/logic"
	"github.com/algorand/go-algorand/data/txntest"
	"github.com/algorand/go-algorand/protocol"
	"github.com/algorand/go-algorand/test/partitiontest"
	"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
)

// TestAppSharing confirms that as of v9, apps can be accessed across groups,
// but that before then, they could not.
func TestAppSharing(t *testing.T) {
	partitiontest.PartitionTest(t)
	t.Parallel()

	// Create some sample transactions. The main reason this a blackbox test
	// (_test package) is to have access to txntest.
	appl0 := txntest.Txn{
		Type:          protocol.ApplicationCallTx,
		ApplicationID: 900,
		Sender:        basics.Address{1, 2, 3, 4},
		ForeignApps:   []basics.AppIndex{500},
	}

	appl1 := txntest.Txn{
		Type:          protocol.ApplicationCallTx,
		ApplicationID: 901,
		Sender:        basics.Address{4, 3, 2, 1},
	}

	appl2 := txntest.Txn{
		Type:          protocol.ApplicationCallTx,
		ApplicationID: 902,
		Sender:        basics.Address{1, 2, 3, 4},
	}

	pay1 := txntest.Txn{
		Type:     protocol.PaymentTx,
		Sender:   basics.Address{5, 5, 5, 5},
		Receiver: basics.Address{6, 6, 6, 6},
	}

	getSchema := "int 500; app_params_get AppGlobalNumByteSlice; !; assert; pop; int 1"
	// In v8, the first tx can read app params of 500, because it's in its
	// foreign array, but the second can't
	TestApps(t, []string{getSchema, getSchema}, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl1), 8, nil,
		Exp(1, "unavailable App 500"))
	// In v9, the second can, because the first can.
	TestApps(t, []string{getSchema, getSchema}, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl1), 9, nil)

	getLocalEx := `txn Sender; int 500; byte "some-key"; app_local_get_ex; pop; pop; int 1`

	// In contrast, here there's no help from v9, because the second tx is
	// reading the locals for a different account.

	// app_local_get* requires the address and the app exist, else the program fails
	TestApps(t, []string{getLocalEx, getLocalEx}, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl1), 8, nil,
		Exp(0, "no account"))

	_, _, ledger := MakeSampleEnv()
	ledger.NewAccount(appl0.Sender, 100_000)
	ledger.NewAccount(appl1.Sender, 100_000)
	ledger.NewApp(appl0.Sender, 500, basics.AppParams{})
	ledger.NewLocals(appl0.Sender, 500) // opt in
	// Now txn0 passes, but txn1 has an error because it can't see app 500
	TestApps(t, []string{getLocalEx, getLocalEx}, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl1), 9, ledger,
		Exp(1, "unavailable Local State"))

	// But it's ok in appl2, because appl2 uses the same Sender, even though the
	// foreign-app is not repeated in appl2 because the holding being accessed
	// is the one from tx0.
	TestApps(t, []string{getLocalEx, getLocalEx}, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl2), 9, ledger)
	TestApps(t, []string{getLocalEx, getLocalEx}, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl2), 8, ledger, // version 8 does not get sharing
		Exp(1, "unavailable App 500"))

	// Checking if an account is opted in has pretty much the same rules
	optInCheck500 := "txn Sender; int 500; app_opted_in"

	// app_opted_in requires the address and the app exist, else the program fails
	TestApps(t, []string{optInCheck500, optInCheck500}, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl1), 9, nil, // nil ledger, no account
		Exp(0, "no account: "+appl0.Sender.String()))

	// Now txn0 passes, but txn1 has an error because it can't see app 500 locals for appl1.Sender
	TestApps(t, []string{optInCheck500, optInCheck500}, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl1), 9, ledger,
		Exp(1, "unavailable Local State "+appl1.Sender.String()))

	// But it's ok in appl2, because appl2 uses the same Sender, even though the
	// foreign-app is not repeated in appl2 because the holding being accessed
	// is the one from tx0.
	TestApps(t, []string{optInCheck500, optInCheck500}, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl2), 9, ledger)
	TestApps(t, []string{optInCheck500, optInCheck500}, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl2), 8, ledger, // version 8 does not get sharing
		Exp(1, "unavailable App 500"))

	// Confirm sharing applies to the app id called in tx0, not just foreign app array
	optInCheck900 := "txn Sender; int 900; app_opted_in; !" // we did not opt any senders into 900

	// as above, appl1 can't see the local state, but appl2 can b/c sender is same as appl0
	TestApps(t, []string{optInCheck900, optInCheck900}, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl1), 9, ledger,
		Exp(1, "unavailable Local State "+appl1.Sender.String()))
	TestApps(t, []string{optInCheck900, optInCheck900}, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl2), 9, ledger)
	TestApps(t, []string{optInCheck900, optInCheck900}, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl2), 8, ledger, // v8=no sharing
		Exp(1, "unavailable App 900"))

	// Now, confirm that *setting* a local state in tx1 that was made available
	// in tx0 works.  The extra check here is that the change is recorded
	// properly in EvalDelta.
	putLocal := `txn ApplicationArgs 0; byte "X"; int 74; app_local_put; int 1`

	noop := `int 1`
	sources := []string{noop, putLocal}
	appl1.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{appl0.Sender[:]} // tx1 will try to modify local state exposed in tx0
	// appl0.Sender is available, but 901's local state for it isn't (only 900 is, since 900 was called in tx0)
	TestApps(t, sources, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl1), 9, ledger,
		Exp(1, "unavailable Local State "+appl0.Sender.String()))
	// Add 901 to tx0's ForeignApps, and it works
	appl0.ForeignApps = append(appl0.ForeignApps, 901) // well, it will after we opt in
	TestApps(t, sources, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl1), 9, ledger,
		Exp(1, "account "+appl0.Sender.String()+" is not opted into 901"))
	ledger.NewLocals(appl0.Sender, 901) // opt in
	ep, _ := TestApps(t, sources, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl1), 9, ledger)
	require.Len(t, ep.TxnGroup, 2)
	ed := ep.TxnGroup[1].ApplyData.EvalDelta
	require.Equal(t, map[uint64]basics.StateDelta{
		1: { // no tx.Accounts, 1 indicates first in SharedAccts
			"X": {
				Action: basics.SetUintAction,
				Uint:   74,
			},
		},
	}, ed.LocalDeltas)
	require.Len(t, ed.SharedAccts, 1)
	require.Equal(t, ep.TxnGroup[0].Txn.Sender, ed.SharedAccts[0])

	// when running all three, appl2 can't read the locals of app in tx0 and addr in tx1
	sources = []string{"", "", "gtxn 1 Sender; gtxn 0 Applications 0; byte 0xAA; app_local_get_ex"}
	TestApps(t, sources, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl1, &appl2), 9, nil,
		Exp(2, "unavailable Local State")) // note that the error message is for Locals, not specialized
	// same test of account in array of tx1 rather than Sender
	appl1.Accounts = []basics.Address{{7, 7}}
	sources = []string{"", "", "gtxn 1 Accounts 1; gtxn 0 Applications 0; byte 0xAA; app_local_get_ex"}
	TestApps(t, sources, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl1, &appl2), 9, nil,
		Exp(2, "unavailable Local State")) // note that the error message is for Locals, not specialized

	// try to do a put on local state of the account in tx1, but tx0 ought not have access to that local state
	ledger.NewAccount(pay1.Receiver, 200_000)
	ledger.NewLocals(pay1.Receiver, 900) // opt in
	sources = []string{`gtxn 1 Receiver; byte "key"; byte "val"; app_local_put; int 1`}
	TestApps(t, sources, txntest.Group(&appl0, &pay1), 9, ledger,
		Exp(0, "unavailable Local State "+pay1.Receiver.String()))

	// same for app_local_del
	sources = []string{`gtxn 1 Receiver; byte "key"; app_local_del; int 1`}
	TestApps(t, sources, txntest.Group(&appl0, &pay1), 9, ledger,
		Exp(0, "unavailable Local State "+pay1.Receiver.String()))

	// now, use an app call in tx1, with 900 in the foreign apps, so the local state is available
	appl1.ForeignApps = append(appl1.ForeignApps, 900)
	ledger.NewLocals(appl1.Sender, 900) // opt in
	sources = []string{`gtxn 1 Sender; byte "key"; byte "val"; app_local_put; int 1`}
	TestApps(t, sources, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl1), 9, ledger)
	TestApps(t, sources, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl1), 8, ledger, // 8 doesn't share the account
		Exp(0, "invalid Account reference "+appl1.Sender.String()))
	// same for app_local_del
	sources = []string{`gtxn 1 Sender; byte "key"; app_local_del; int 1`}
	TestApps(t, sources, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl1), 9, ledger)
	TestApps(t, sources, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl1), 8, ledger, // 8 doesn't share the account
		Exp(0, "invalid Account reference "+appl1.Sender.String()))
}

// TestBetterLocalErrors confirms that we get specific errors about the missing
// address or app when accessing a Local State with only one available.
func TestBetterLocalErrors(t *testing.T) {
	partitiontest.PartitionTest(t)
	t.Parallel()

	joe := basics.Address{9, 9, 9}

	ep, tx, ledger := MakeSampleEnv()
	ledger.NewAccount(joe, 5000000)
	ledger.NewApp(joe, 500, basics.AppParams{})
	ledger.NewLocals(joe, 500)

	getLocalEx := `
txn ApplicationArgs 0
txn ApplicationArgs 1; btoi
byte "some-key"
app_local_get_ex
pop; pop; int 1
`
	app := make([]byte, 8)
	binary.BigEndian.PutUint64(app, 500)

	tx.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{joe[:], app}
	TestApp(t, getLocalEx, ep, "unavailable Account "+joe.String()+", unavailable App 500")
	tx.Accounts = []basics.Address{joe}
	TestApp(t, getLocalEx, ep, "unavailable App 500")
	tx.ForeignApps = []basics.AppIndex{500}
	TestApp(t, getLocalEx, ep)
	binary.BigEndian.PutUint64(tx.ApplicationArgs[1], 500)
	TestApp(t, getLocalEx, ep)
	binary.BigEndian.PutUint64(tx.ApplicationArgs[1], 501)
	TestApp(t, getLocalEx, ep, "unavailable App 501")

	binary.BigEndian.PutUint64(tx.ApplicationArgs[1], 500)
	tx.Accounts = []basics.Address{}
	TestApp(t, getLocalEx, ep, "unavailable Account "+joe.String())
}

// TestAssetSharing confirms that as of v9, assets can be accessed across
// groups, but that before then, they could not.
func TestAssetSharing(t *testing.T) {
	partitiontest.PartitionTest(t)
	t.Parallel()

	// Create some sample transactions. The main reason this a blackbox test
	// (_test package) is to have access to txntest.
	appl0 := txntest.Txn{
		Type:          protocol.ApplicationCallTx,
		Sender:        basics.Address{1, 2, 3, 4},
		ForeignAssets: []basics.AssetIndex{400},
	}

	appl1 := txntest.Txn{
		Type:   protocol.ApplicationCallTx,
		Sender: basics.Address{4, 3, 2, 1},
	}

	appl2 := txntest.Txn{
		Type:   protocol.ApplicationCallTx,
		Sender: basics.Address{1, 2, 3, 4},
	}

	getTotal := "int 400; asset_params_get AssetTotal; pop; pop; int 1"

	// In v8, the first tx can read asset 400, because it's in its foreign array,
	// but the second can't
	TestApps(t, []string{getTotal, getTotal}, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl1), 8, nil,
		Exp(1, "unavailable Asset 400"))
	// In v9, the second can, because the first can.
	TestApps(t, []string{getTotal, getTotal}, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl1), 9, nil)

	getBalance := "txn Sender; int 400; asset_holding_get AssetBalance; pop; pop; int 1"

	// In contrast, here there's no help from v9, because the second tx is
	// reading a holding for a different account.
	TestApps(t, []string{getBalance, getBalance}, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl1), 8, nil,
		Exp(1, "unavailable Asset 400"))
	TestApps(t, []string{getBalance, getBalance}, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl1), 9, nil,
		Exp(1, "unavailable Holding"))
	// But it's ok in appl2, because the same account is used, even though the
	// foreign-asset is not repeated in appl2.
	TestApps(t, []string{getBalance, getBalance}, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl2), 9, nil)

	// when running all three, appl2 can't read the holding of asset in tx0 and addr in tx1
	sources := []string{"", "", "gtxn 1 Sender; gtxn 0 Assets 0; asset_holding_get AssetBalance"}
	TestApps(t, sources, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl1, &appl2), 9, nil,
		Exp(2, "unavailable Holding")) // note that the error message is for Holding, not specialized
	// same test of account in array of tx1 rather than Sender
	appl1.Accounts = []basics.Address{{7, 7}}
	sources = []string{"", "", "gtxn 1 Accounts 1; gtxn 0 Assets 0; asset_holding_get AssetBalance"}
	TestApps(t, sources, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl1, &appl2), 9, nil,
		Exp(2, "unavailable Holding")) // note that the error message is for Holding, not specialized
}

// TestBetterHoldingErrors confirms that we get specific errors about the missing
// address or asa when accessesing a holding with only one available.
func TestBetterHoldingErrors(t *testing.T) {
	partitiontest.PartitionTest(t)
	t.Parallel()

	joe := basics.Address{9, 9, 9}

	ep, tx, ledger := MakeSampleEnv()
	ledger.NewAccount(joe, 5000000)
	ledger.NewAsset(joe, 200, basics.AssetParams{})
	// as creator, joe will also be opted in

	getHoldingBalance := `
txn ApplicationArgs 0
txn ApplicationArgs 1; btoi
asset_holding_get AssetBalance
pop; pop; int 1
`
	asa := make([]byte, 8)
	binary.BigEndian.PutUint64(asa, 200)

	tx.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{joe[:], asa}
	TestApp(t, getHoldingBalance, ep, "unavailable Account "+joe.String()+", unavailable Asset 200")
	tx.Accounts = []basics.Address{joe}
	TestApp(t, getHoldingBalance, ep, "unavailable Asset 200")
	tx.ForeignAssets = []basics.AssetIndex{200}
	TestApp(t, getHoldingBalance, ep)
	binary.BigEndian.PutUint64(tx.ApplicationArgs[1], 0) // slot=0 is same (200)
	TestApp(t, getHoldingBalance, ep)

	binary.BigEndian.PutUint64(tx.ApplicationArgs[1], 200)
	tx.Accounts = []basics.Address{}
	TestApp(t, getHoldingBalance, ep, "unavailable Account "+joe.String())
}

// TestAccountPassing checks that the current app account and foreign app's
// accounts can be passed in txn.Accounts for a called app.
func TestAccountPassing(t *testing.T) {
	partitiontest.PartitionTest(t)
	t.Parallel()

	// appAddressVersion=7
	TestLogicRange(t, 7, 0, func(t *testing.T, ep *EvalParams, tx *transactions.Transaction, ledger *Ledger) {
		t.Parallel()
		accept := TestProg(t, "int 1", 6)
		alice := basics.Address{1, 1, 1, 1, 1}
		ledger.NewApp(alice, 4, basics.AppParams{
			ApprovalProgram: accept.Program,
		})
		callWithAccount := `
itxn_begin
	int appl;	                       itxn_field TypeEnum
    int 4;	                           itxn_field ApplicationID
    %s;  itxn_field Accounts
itxn_submit
int 1`
		tx.ForeignApps = []basics.AppIndex{4}
		ledger.NewAccount(appAddr(888), 50_000)
		// First show that we're not just letting anything get passed in
		TestApp(t, fmt.Sprintf(callWithAccount, "int 32; bzero; byte 0x07; b|"), ep,
			"unavailable Account AAAAA")
		// Now show we can pass our own address
		TestApp(t, fmt.Sprintf(callWithAccount, "global CurrentApplicationAddress"), ep)
		// Or the address of one of our ForeignApps
		TestApp(t, fmt.Sprintf(callWithAccount, "addr "+basics.AppIndex(4).Address().String()), ep)
	})
}

// TestOtherTxSharing tests resource sharing across other kinds of transactions besides appl.
func TestOtherTxSharing(t *testing.T) {
	partitiontest.PartitionTest(t)
	t.Parallel()

	_, _, ledger := MakeSampleEnv()

	senderAcct := basics.Address{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 1}
	ledger.NewAccount(senderAcct, 2001)
	senderBalance := "txn ApplicationArgs 0; balance; int 2001; =="

	receiverAcct := basics.Address{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 2}
	ledger.NewAccount(receiverAcct, 2002)
	receiverBalance := "txn ApplicationArgs 0; balance; int 2002; =="

	otherAcct := basics.Address{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 3}
	ledger.NewAccount(otherAcct, 2003)
	otherBalance := "txn ApplicationArgs 0; balance; int 2003; =="

	other2Acct := basics.Address{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 4}
	ledger.NewAccount(other2Acct, 2004)
	other2Balance := "txn ApplicationArgs 0; balance; int 2004; =="

	appl := txntest.Txn{
		Type:            protocol.ApplicationCallTx,
		Sender:          basics.Address{5, 5, 5, 5}, // different from all other accounts used
		ApplicationArgs: [][]byte{senderAcct[:]},
	}

	keyreg := txntest.Txn{
		Type:   protocol.KeyRegistrationTx,
		Sender: senderAcct,
	}
	pay := txntest.Txn{
		Type:     protocol.PaymentTx,
		Sender:   senderAcct,
		Receiver: receiverAcct,
	}
	acfg := txntest.Txn{
		Type:   protocol.AssetConfigTx,
		Sender: senderAcct,
		AssetParams: basics.AssetParams{
			Manager:  otherAcct, // other is here to show they _don't_ become available
			Reserve:  otherAcct,
			Freeze:   otherAcct,
			Clawback: otherAcct,
		},
	}
	axfer := txntest.Txn{
		Type:          protocol.AssetTransferTx,
		XferAsset:     100, // must be < 256, later code assumes it fits in a byte
		Sender:        senderAcct,
		AssetReceiver: receiverAcct,
		AssetSender:   otherAcct,
	}
	afrz := txntest.Txn{
		Type:          protocol.AssetFreezeTx,
		FreezeAsset:   200, // must be < 256, later code assumes it fits in a byte
		Sender:        senderAcct,
		FreezeAccount: otherAcct,
	}

	for _, send := range []txntest.Txn{keyreg, pay, acfg, axfer, afrz} {
		TestApps(t, []string{"", senderBalance}, txntest.Group(&send, &appl), 9, ledger)
		TestApps(t, []string{senderBalance, ""}, txntest.Group(&appl, &send), 9, ledger)

		TestApps(t, []string{"", senderBalance}, txntest.Group(&send, &appl), 8, ledger,
			Exp(1, "invalid Account reference"))
		TestApps(t, []string{senderBalance, ""}, txntest.Group(&appl, &send), 8, ledger,
			Exp(0, "invalid Account reference"))
	}

	holdingAccess := `
	txn ApplicationArgs 0
	txn ApplicationArgs 1; btoi
	asset_holding_get AssetBalance
	pop; pop; int 1
`

	t.Run("keyreg", func(t *testing.T) { // nolint:paralleltest // shares `ledger`
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{senderAcct[:], {200}}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", holdingAccess}, txntest.Group(&keyreg, &appl), 9, ledger,
			Exp(1, "unavailable Asset 200"))
		withRef := appl
		withRef.ForeignAssets = []basics.AssetIndex{200}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", holdingAccess}, txntest.Group(&keyreg, &withRef), 9, ledger,
			Exp(1, "unavailable Holding "+senderAcct.String()))
	})
	t.Run("pay", func(t *testing.T) { // nolint:paralleltest // shares `ledger`
		// The receiver is available for algo balance reading
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{receiverAcct[:]}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", receiverBalance}, txntest.Group(&pay, &appl), 9, ledger)

		// The other account is not (it's not even in the pay txn)
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{otherAcct[:]}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", otherBalance}, txntest.Group(&pay, &appl), 9, ledger,
			Exp(1, "invalid Account reference "+otherAcct.String()))

		// The other account becomes accessible because used in CloseRemainderTo
		withClose := pay
		withClose.CloseRemainderTo = otherAcct
		TestApps(t, []string{"", otherBalance}, txntest.Group(&withClose, &appl), 9, ledger)
	})

	t.Run("acfg", func(t *testing.T) { // nolint:paralleltest // shares `ledger`
		// The other account is not available even though it's all the extra addresses
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{otherAcct[:]}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", otherBalance}, txntest.Group(&acfg, &appl), 9, ledger,
			Exp(1, "invalid Account reference "+otherAcct.String()))
	})

	t.Run("axfer", func(t *testing.T) { // nolint:paralleltest // shares `ledger`
		// The receiver is also available for algo balance reading
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{receiverAcct[:]}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", receiverBalance}, txntest.Group(&axfer, &appl), 9, ledger)

		// as is the "other" (AssetSender)
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{otherAcct[:]}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", otherBalance}, txntest.Group(&axfer, &appl), 9, ledger)

		// sender holding is available
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{senderAcct[:], {byte(axfer.XferAsset)}}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", holdingAccess}, txntest.Group(&axfer, &appl), 9, ledger)

		// receiver holding is available
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{receiverAcct[:], {byte(axfer.XferAsset)}}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", holdingAccess}, txntest.Group(&axfer, &appl), 9, ledger)

		// asset sender (other) account is available
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{otherAcct[:], {byte(axfer.XferAsset)}}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", holdingAccess}, txntest.Group(&axfer, &appl), 9, ledger)

		// AssetCloseTo holding becomes available when set
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{other2Acct[:], {byte(axfer.XferAsset)}}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", other2Balance}, txntest.Group(&axfer, &appl), 9, ledger,
			Exp(1, "invalid Account reference "+other2Acct.String()))
		TestApps(t, []string{"", holdingAccess}, txntest.Group(&axfer, &appl), 9, ledger,
			Exp(1, "unavailable Account "+other2Acct.String()))

		withClose := axfer
		withClose.AssetCloseTo = other2Acct
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{other2Acct[:], {byte(axfer.XferAsset)}}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", other2Balance}, txntest.Group(&withClose, &appl), 9, ledger)
		TestApps(t, []string{"", holdingAccess}, txntest.Group(&withClose, &appl), 9, ledger)
	})

	t.Run("afrz", func(t *testing.T) { // nolint:paralleltest // shares `ledger`
		// The other account is available (for algo and asset)
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{otherAcct[:], {byte(afrz.FreezeAsset)}}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", otherBalance}, txntest.Group(&afrz, &appl), 9, ledger)
		TestApps(t, []string{"", holdingAccess}, txntest.Group(&afrz, &appl), 9, ledger)

		// The sender holding is _not_ (because the freezeaccount's holding is irrelevant to afrz)
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{senderAcct[:], {byte(afrz.FreezeAsset)}}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", senderBalance}, txntest.Group(&afrz, &appl), 9, ledger)
		TestApps(t, []string{"", holdingAccess}, txntest.Group(&afrz, &appl), 9, ledger,
			Exp(1, "unavailable Holding "+senderAcct.String()))
	})
}

// TestSharedInnerTxns checks how inner txns access resources.
func TestSharedInnerTxns(t *testing.T) {
	partitiontest.PartitionTest(t)
	t.Parallel()

	_, _, ledger := MakeSampleEnv()

	const asa1 = 201
	const asa2 = 202

	senderAcct := basics.Address{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 1}
	ledger.NewAccount(senderAcct, 2001)
	ledger.NewHolding(senderAcct, asa1, 1, false)

	receiverAcct := basics.Address{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 2}
	ledger.NewAccount(receiverAcct, 2002)
	ledger.NewHolding(receiverAcct, asa1, 1, false)

	otherAcct := basics.Address{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 3}
	ledger.NewAccount(otherAcct, 2003)
	ledger.NewHolding(otherAcct, asa1, 1, false)

	unusedAcct := basics.Address{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 4}

	payToArg := `
itxn_begin
  int pay;               itxn_field TypeEnum
  int 100;               itxn_field Amount
  txn ApplicationArgs 0; itxn_field Receiver
itxn_submit
int 1
`
	axferToArgs := `
itxn_begin
  int axfer;                   itxn_field TypeEnum
  int 2;                       itxn_field AssetAmount
  txn ApplicationArgs 0;       itxn_field AssetReceiver
  txn ApplicationArgs 1; btoi; itxn_field XferAsset
itxn_submit
int 1
`

	acfgArg := `
itxn_begin
  int acfg;                    itxn_field TypeEnum
  txn ApplicationArgs 0; btoi; itxn_field ConfigAsset
itxn_submit
int 1
`

	appl := txntest.Txn{
		Type:          protocol.ApplicationCallTx,
		ApplicationID: 1234,
		Sender:        basics.Address{5, 5, 5, 5}, // different from all other accounts used
	}
	appAcct := appl.ApplicationID.Address()
	// App will do a lot of txns. Start well funded.
	ledger.NewAccount(appAcct, 1_000_000)
	// And needs some ASAs for inner axfer testing
	ledger.NewHolding(appAcct, asa1, 1_000_000, false)

	t.Run("keyreg", func(t *testing.T) { // nolint:paralleltest // shares `ledger`
		keyreg := txntest.Txn{
			Type:   protocol.KeyRegistrationTx,
			Sender: senderAcct,
		}

		// appl has no foreign ref to senderAcct, but can still inner pay it
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{senderAcct[:]}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", payToArg}, txntest.Group(&keyreg, &appl), 9, ledger)
		TestApps(t, []string{"", payToArg}, txntest.Group(&keyreg, &appl), 8, ledger,
			Exp(1, "unavailable Account "+senderAcct.String()))

		// confirm you can't just pay _anybody_. receiverAcct is not in use at all.
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{receiverAcct[:]}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", payToArg}, txntest.Group(&keyreg, &appl), 9, ledger,
			Exp(1, "unavailable Account "+receiverAcct.String()))
	})

	t.Run("pay", func(t *testing.T) { // nolint:paralleltest // shares `ledger`
		pay := txntest.Txn{
			Type:     protocol.PaymentTx,
			Sender:   senderAcct,
			Receiver: receiverAcct,
		}

		// appl has no foreign ref to senderAcct or receiverAcct, but can still inner pay them
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{senderAcct[:]}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", payToArg}, txntest.Group(&pay, &appl), 9, ledger)
		TestApps(t, []string{"", payToArg}, txntest.Group(&pay, &appl), 8, ledger,
			Exp(1, "unavailable Account "+senderAcct.String()))

		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{receiverAcct[:]}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", payToArg}, txntest.Group(&pay, &appl), 9, ledger)
		TestApps(t, []string{"", payToArg}, txntest.Group(&pay, &appl), 8, ledger,
			Exp(1, "unavailable Account "+receiverAcct.String()))

		// confirm you can't just pay _anybody_. otherAcct is not in use at all.
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{otherAcct[:]}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", payToArg}, txntest.Group(&pay, &appl), 9, ledger,
			Exp(1, "unavailable Account "+otherAcct.String()))
	})

	t.Run("axfer", func(t *testing.T) { // nolint:paralleltest // shares `ledger`
		axfer := txntest.Txn{
			Type:          protocol.AssetTransferTx,
			XferAsset:     asa1,
			Sender:        senderAcct,
			AssetReceiver: receiverAcct,
			AssetSender:   otherAcct,
		}

		// appl can pay the axfer sender
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{senderAcct[:], {asa1}}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", payToArg}, txntest.Group(&axfer, &appl), 9, ledger)
		TestApps(t, []string{"", payToArg}, txntest.Group(&axfer, &appl), 8, ledger,
			Exp(1, "unavailable Account "+senderAcct.String()))
		// but can't axfer to sender, because appAcct doesn't have holding access for the asa
		TestApps(t, []string{"", axferToArgs}, txntest.Group(&axfer, &appl), 9, ledger,
			Exp(1, "unavailable Holding"))
		// and to the receiver
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{receiverAcct[:], {asa1}}
		TestApps(t, []string{payToArg}, txntest.Group(&appl, &axfer), 9, ledger)
		TestApps(t, []string{axferToArgs}, txntest.Group(&appl, &axfer), 9, ledger,
			Exp(0, "unavailable Holding"))
		// and to the clawback
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{otherAcct[:], {asa1}}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", payToArg}, txntest.Group(&axfer, &appl), 9, ledger)
		TestApps(t, []string{"", axferToArgs}, txntest.Group(&axfer, &appl), 9, ledger,
			Exp(1, "unavailable Holding"))

		// Those axfers become possible by adding the asa to the appl's ForeignAssets
		appl.ForeignAssets = []basics.AssetIndex{asa1}
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{senderAcct[:], {asa1}}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", axferToArgs}, txntest.Group(&axfer, &appl), 9, ledger)
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{receiverAcct[:], {asa1}}
		TestApps(t, []string{axferToArgs}, txntest.Group(&appl, &axfer), 9, ledger)
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{otherAcct[:], {asa1}}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", axferToArgs}, txntest.Group(&axfer, &appl), 9, ledger)

		// but can't axfer a different asset
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{senderAcct[:], {asa2}}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", axferToArgs}, txntest.Group(&axfer, &appl), 9, ledger,
			Exp(1, fmt.Sprintf("unavailable Asset %d", asa2)))
		// or correct asset to an unknown address
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{unusedAcct[:], {asa1}}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", axferToArgs}, txntest.Group(&axfer, &appl), 9, ledger,
			Exp(1, "unavailable Account"))

		// appl can acfg the asset from tx0 (which requires asset available, not holding)
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{{asa1}}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", acfgArg}, txntest.Group(&axfer, &appl), 9, ledger)
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{{asa2}} // but not asa2
		TestApps(t, []string{"", acfgArg}, txntest.Group(&axfer, &appl), 9, ledger,
			Exp(1, fmt.Sprintf("unavailable Asset %d", asa2)))

		// Now, confirm that access to account from a pay in one tx, and asa
		// from another don't allow inner axfer in the third (because there's no
		// access to that payer's holding.)
		payAcct := basics.Address{3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2}
		pay := txntest.Txn{
			Type:     protocol.PaymentTx,
			Sender:   payAcct,
			Receiver: payAcct,
		}
		// the asset is acfg-able
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{{asa1}}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", "", acfgArg}, txntest.Group(&pay, &axfer, &appl), 9, ledger)
		TestApps(t, []string{"", "", acfgArg}, txntest.Group(&axfer, &pay, &appl), 9, ledger)
		// payAcct (the pay sender) is payable
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{payAcct[:]}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", "", payToArg}, txntest.Group(&axfer, &pay, &appl), 9, ledger)
		// but the cross-product is not available, so no axfer (opting in first, to prevent that error)
		ledger.NewHolding(payAcct, asa1, 1, false)
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{payAcct[:], {asa1}}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", "", axferToArgs}, txntest.Group(&axfer, &pay, &appl), 9, ledger,
			Exp(2, "unavailable Holding "+payAcct.String()))
	})

	t.Run("afrz", func(t *testing.T) { // nolint:paralleltest // shares `ledger`
		appl.ForeignAssets = []basics.AssetIndex{} // reset after previous tests
		afrz := txntest.Txn{
			Type:          protocol.AssetFreezeTx,
			FreezeAsset:   asa1,
			Sender:        senderAcct,
			FreezeAccount: otherAcct,
		}

		// appl can pay to the sender & freeze account
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{senderAcct[:], {asa1}}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", payToArg}, txntest.Group(&afrz, &appl), 9, ledger)
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{otherAcct[:], {asa1}}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", payToArg}, txntest.Group(&afrz, &appl), 9, ledger)

		// can't axfer to the afrz sender because appAcct holding is not available from afrz
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{senderAcct[:], {asa1}}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", axferToArgs}, txntest.Group(&afrz, &appl), 9, ledger,
			Exp(1, "unavailable Holding "+appAcct.String()))
		appl.ForeignAssets = []basics.AssetIndex{asa1}
		// _still_ can't axfer to sender because afrz sender's holding does NOT
		// become available (not note that complaint is now about that account)
		TestApps(t, []string{"", axferToArgs}, txntest.Group(&afrz, &appl), 9, ledger,
			Exp(1, "unavailable Holding "+senderAcct.String()))

		// and not to the receiver which isn't in afrz
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{receiverAcct[:], {asa1}}
		TestApps(t, []string{payToArg}, txntest.Group(&appl, &afrz), 9, ledger,
			Exp(0, "unavailable Account "+receiverAcct.String()))
		TestApps(t, []string{axferToArgs}, txntest.Group(&appl, &afrz), 9, ledger,
			Exp(0, "unavailable Account "+receiverAcct.String()))

		// otherAcct is the afrz target, it's holding and account are available
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{otherAcct[:], {asa1}}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", payToArg}, txntest.Group(&afrz, &appl), 9, ledger)
		TestApps(t, []string{"", axferToArgs}, txntest.Group(&afrz, &appl), 9, ledger)

		// but still can't axfer a different asset
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{otherAcct[:], {asa2}}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", axferToArgs}, txntest.Group(&afrz, &appl), 9, ledger,
			Exp(1, fmt.Sprintf("unavailable Asset %d", asa2)))
		appl.ForeignAssets = []basics.AssetIndex{asa2}
		// once added to appl's foreign array, the appl still lacks access to other's holding
		TestApps(t, []string{"", axferToArgs}, txntest.Group(&afrz, &appl), 9, ledger,
			Exp(1, "unavailable Holding "+otherAcct.String()))

		// appl can acfg the asset from tx0 (which requires asset available, not holding)
		appl.ForeignAssets = []basics.AssetIndex{}
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{{asa1}}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", acfgArg}, txntest.Group(&afrz, &appl), 9, ledger)
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{{asa2}} // but not asa2
		TestApps(t, []string{"", acfgArg}, txntest.Group(&afrz, &appl), 9, ledger,
			Exp(1, fmt.Sprintf("unavailable Asset %d", asa2)))

	})

	t.Run("appl", func(t *testing.T) { // nolint:paralleltest // shares `ledger`
		appl.ForeignAssets = []basics.AssetIndex{} // reset after previous test
		appl.Accounts = []basics.Address{}         // reset after previous tests
		appl0 := txntest.Txn{
			Type:          protocol.ApplicationCallTx,
			Sender:        senderAcct,
			Accounts:      []basics.Address{otherAcct},
			ForeignAssets: []basics.AssetIndex{asa1},
		}

		// appl can pay to the otherAcct because it was in tx0
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{otherAcct[:], {asa1}}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", payToArg}, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl), 9, ledger)
		TestApps(t, []string{"", payToArg}, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl), 8, ledger, // version 8 does not get sharing
			Exp(1, "unavailable Account "+otherAcct.String()))
		// appl can (almost) axfer asa1 to the otherAcct because both are in tx0
		TestApps(t, []string{"", axferToArgs}, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl), 9, ledger,
			Exp(1, "axfer Sender: unavailable Holding"))
		// but it can't take access it's OWN asa1, unless added to ForeignAssets
		appl.ForeignAssets = []basics.AssetIndex{asa1}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", axferToArgs}, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl), 9, ledger)

		// but it can't use 202 at all. notice the error is more direct that
		// above, as the problem is not the axfer Sender, only, it's that 202
		// can't be used at all.
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{otherAcct[:], {asa2}}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", axferToArgs}, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl), 9, ledger,
			Exp(1, "unavailable Asset 202"))
		// And adding asa2 does not fix this problem, because the other x 202 holding is unavailable
		appl.ForeignAssets = []basics.AssetIndex{asa2}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", axferToArgs}, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl), 9, ledger,
			Exp(1, "axfer AssetReceiver: unavailable Holding "+otherAcct.String()+" x 202"))

		// Now, conduct similar tests, but with the apps performing the
		// pays/axfers invoked from an outer app. Use various versions to check
		// cross version sharing.

		// add v8 and v9 versions of the pay app to the ledger for inner calling
		payToArgV8 := TestProg(t, payToArg, 8)
		ledger.NewApp(senderAcct, 88, basics.AppParams{ApprovalProgram: payToArgV8.Program})
		ledger.NewAccount(appAddr(88), 1_000_000)
		payToArgV9 := TestProg(t, payToArg, 9)
		ledger.NewApp(senderAcct, 99, basics.AppParams{ApprovalProgram: payToArgV9.Program})
		ledger.NewAccount(appAddr(99), 1_000_000)

		approvalV8 := TestProg(t, "int 1", 8)
		ledger.NewApp(senderAcct, 11, basics.AppParams{ApprovalProgram: approvalV8.Program})

		innerCallTemplate := `
itxn_begin
int appl;                     itxn_field TypeEnum;
txn ApplicationArgs 0; btoi;  itxn_field ApplicationID
txn ApplicationArgs 1;        itxn_field ApplicationArgs
txn ApplicationArgs 2;        itxn_field ApplicationArgs
%s
itxn_submit
int 1
`
		innerCall := fmt.Sprintf(innerCallTemplate, "")

		appl.ForeignApps = []basics.AppIndex{11, 88, 99}

		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{{99}, otherAcct[:], {asa1}}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", innerCall}, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl), 9, ledger)
		// when the inner program is v8, it can't perform the pay
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{{88}, otherAcct[:], {asa1}}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", innerCall}, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl), 9, ledger,
			Exp(1, "unavailable Account "+otherAcct.String()))
		// unless the caller passes in the account, but it can't pass the
		// account because that also would give the called app access to the
		// passed account's local state (which isn't available to the caller)
		innerCallWithAccount := fmt.Sprintf(innerCallTemplate, "addr "+otherAcct.String()+"; itxn_field Accounts")
		TestApps(t, []string{"", innerCallWithAccount}, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl), 9, ledger,
			Exp(1, "appl ApplicationID: unavailable Local State "+otherAcct.String()))
		// the caller can't fix by passing 88 as a foreign app, because doing so
		// is not much different than the current situation: 88 is being called,
		// it's already available.
		innerCallWithBoth := fmt.Sprintf(innerCallTemplate,
			"addr "+otherAcct.String()+"; itxn_field Accounts; int 88; itxn_field Applications")
		TestApps(t, []string{"", innerCallWithBoth}, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl), 9, ledger,
			Exp(1, "appl ApplicationID: unavailable Local State "+otherAcct.String()))

		// the caller *can* do it if it originally had access to that 88 holding.
		appl0.ForeignApps = []basics.AppIndex{88}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", innerCallWithAccount}, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl), 9, ledger)

		// here we confirm that even if we try calling another app, we still
		// can't pass in `other` and 88, because that would give the app access
		// to that local state. (this is confirming we check the cross product
		// of the foreign arrays, not just the accounts against called app id)
		appl.ApplicationArgs = [][]byte{{11}, otherAcct[:], {asa1}}
		appl0.ForeignApps = []basics.AppIndex{11}
		TestApps(t, []string{"", innerCallWithBoth}, txntest.Group(&appl0, &appl), 9, ledger,
			Exp(1, "appl ForeignApps: unavailable Local State "+otherAcct.String()))

	})

}

// TestAccessMyLocals confirms that apps can access their OWN locals if they opt
// in at creation time.
func TestAccessMyLocals(t *testing.T) {
	partitiontest.PartitionTest(t)
	t.Parallel()

	// start at 3, needs assert
	TestLogicRange(t, 3, 0, func(t *testing.T, ep *EvalParams, tx *transactions.Transaction, ledger *Ledger) {
		sender := basics.Address{1, 2, 3, 4}
		ledger.NewAccount(sender, 1_000_000)
		// we don't really process transactions in these tests, so despite the
		// OptInOC below, we must manually opt the sender into the app that
		// will get created for this test.
		ledger.NewLocals(sender, 888)

		*tx = txntest.Txn{
			Type:          protocol.ApplicationCallTx,
			Sender:        sender,
			ApplicationID: 0,
			OnCompletion:  transactions.OptInOC,
			LocalStateSchema: basics.StateSchema{
				NumUint: 1,
			},
		}.Txn()
		source := `
  int 0
  byte "X"
  app_local_get
  !
  assert
  int 0
  byte "X"
  int 7
  app_local_put
  int 0
  byte "X"
  app_local_get
  int 7
  ==
  assert
  int 0
  byte "X"
  app_local_del
  int 1
`
		TestApp(t, source, ep)
		if ep.Proto.LogicSigVersion >= 4 {
			// confirm "txn Sender" also works
			source = strings.ReplaceAll(source, "int 0\n", "txn Sender\n")
			TestApp(t, source, ep)
		}

		TestApp(t, "int 0; int 0; app_opted_in", ep)
	})
}