diff options
| author | Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge@gnu.org> | 2006-11-29 10:54:41 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge@gnu.org> | 2009-06-18 00:26:56 +0200 |
| commit | 763f4bef0d7bec67a90ced2dedbafc9bc46de6de (patch) | |
| tree | 2cc4d968f89b98c7ac567b89560c6a324078466c /configure.ac | |
| parent | 6c69296d41273d98e59b84000bf93c37c7ff5f03 (diff) | |
2006-11-29 Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge@gnu.org>
* configure.ac (disable_smashing_stack_protector): New conditional, set
depending on the compiler accepting `-fstack-protector' or not.
* Makefile.am (CFLAGS): Add `-fno-stack-protector' if
`disable_smashing_stack_protector' is set.
Diffstat (limited to 'configure.ac')
| -rw-r--r-- | configure.ac | 24 |
1 files changed, 24 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index a4866d60..f15f08fc 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -114,6 +114,30 @@ m4_include([linux/configfrag.ac]) dnl [fi] # +# Compiler features. +# + +# Smashing stack protector. +[ssp_possible=yes] +AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether the compiler accepts `-fstack-protector']) +# Is this a reliable test case? +AC_LANG_CONFTEST([[void foo (void) { volatile char a[8]; a[3]; }]]) +[# `$CC -c -o ...' might not be portable. But, oh, well... Is calling +# `ac_compile' like this correct, after all? +if eval "$ac_compile -S -fstack-protector -o conftest.s" 2> /dev/null; then] + AC_MSG_RESULT([yes]) + [# Should we clear up other files as well, having called `AC_LANG_CONFTEST'? + rm -f conftest.s +else + ssp_possible=no] + AC_MSG_RESULT([no]) +[fi +# Need that, because some distributions ship compilers that include +# `-fstack-protector' in the default specs.] +AM_CONDITIONAL([disable_smashing_stack_protector], + [[[ x"$ssp_possible" = xyes ]]]) + +# # Output. # |