summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>2021-04-06 15:13:02 -0400
committerJason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>2022-05-13 13:39:30 -0400
commite0cc2713a4076edd4f20b80b0fe217c9ab1676b2 (patch)
tree4dea798f68ffcc9457e6abfde147d63b24a8db02
parent370440f9f9860b59686138cf5213601cf6dda812 (diff)
c++: access checking in aggregate initialization [PR96673]
We were deferring access checks while parsing B<int>{}, didn't adjust that when we went to instantiate the default member initializer for B::c, deferred access checking for C::C, and then checked it after parsing B<int>{}, back in the main() context which has no access. We need to do the access checks in the class context of the DMI. I tried fixing this in push_to/pop_from_top_level, but that caused several regressions. gcc/cp/ChangeLog: PR c++/96673 * init.c (get_nsdmi): Don't defer access checking. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR c++/96673 * g++.dg/cpp1y/nsdmi-aggr13.C: New test.
-rw-r--r--gcc/cp/init.c2
-rw-r--r--gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/nsdmi-aggr13.C33
2 files changed, 35 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/cp/init.c b/gcc/cp/init.c
index 44f767481c4..dc9145892c4 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/init.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/init.c
@@ -591,6 +591,7 @@ get_nsdmi (tree member, bool in_ctor, tsubst_flags_t complain)
{
push_to_top_level ();
push_nested_class (ctx);
+ push_deferring_access_checks (dk_no_deferred);
pushed = true;
}
@@ -620,6 +621,7 @@ get_nsdmi (tree member, bool in_ctor, tsubst_flags_t complain)
if (pushed)
{
+ pop_deferring_access_checks ();
pop_nested_class ();
pop_from_top_level ();
}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/nsdmi-aggr13.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/nsdmi-aggr13.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..845e26ff593
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/nsdmi-aggr13.C
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+// PR c++/96673
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+template <class T>
+class A {};
+
+template <class T>
+class B;
+
+template <class T>
+class C {
+ private:
+
+ friend class B<T>;
+
+ explicit C(A<T>&) {};
+};
+
+
+template <class T>
+class B {
+ public:
+ B() = default;
+ //B() {}; // << This implementation of the constructor makes it work
+
+ A<T> a = {};
+ C<T> c = C<T>{a};
+};
+
+int main() {
+ auto b = B<int>{};
+ auto &c = b.c;
+}